|Re: Drivers Try an Anti-Photo Finish|
13 Jan 2005 08:24:38 -0800
John R. Covert wrote:|
> In reply to an article stating "the firms that make and operate
> Linc Madison wrote:
>> What UTTER and COMPLETE nonsense! If the positive image is illegible,
> This is only true if you are assuming EXACTLY the same technology for
> The shadow definition (the number of different levels of light and
> So it's not nonsense at all. You might enjoy the movie "Blow Up!"
I hate Photo Cop, red light camera, speed camera, photo radar, traffic
Are you sure this PhotoBlocker spray works? They claim that it was
www.photoblocker.com Please let me know what you think.
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: Rick Merrill: "Re: Digital Video Programmer WANTED"|
|Go to Previous message: J.P. Wing: "Re: Executone PBX and a Problem"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|