|Re: Schools Prohibit Personal E-mail Sites|
|Robert Bonomi (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:38:36 -0000
In article <email@example.com>,|
> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Here is a question for the collected
I think you forget about the CarterPhone decision.
Final decision, merely six years before the filing of the lawsuit that
Bell system (nor any other telco) could not require use of "their"
The primary "alternative" long-distance carriers (United Telecom and
As "_off_ ARPAnet/NSFnet" IP use spread, going to the 'alternative'
And, of course, MFS had been doing the same under-cutting in the
If the "Bell System/AT&T/Western Electric" had remained a monolithic
OTOH, DSL would not likely be ubiquitous, as it is today; "high speed"
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Sounds a little grim to me. PAT]
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: Wesrock@aol.com: "Re: Please Explain LATA"|
|Go to Previous message: T. Sean Weintz: "Re: AOL Users Most Likely to Make Zombie of Your Computer"|
|May be in reply to: Monty Solomon: "Schools Prohibit Personal E-mail Sites"|
|Next in thread: Justin Time: "Re: Schools Prohibit Personal E-mail Sites"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|