|Re: Broadband Competition Must Surely be Working|
|Garrett Wollman (email@example.com)|
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:37:48 UTC
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,|
> I don't agree about the barriers. As I mentioned, our local cable
Your local cable company was granted a monopoly on cable TV service in
> Two years ago we had a massive blackout thanks to this "new model".
Completely false. You had a massive blackout because the (regulated)
> Today the national grid is carrying far more power than
There is no "national grid", unless you're referring to the
>> The barriers to entry in "local loop" services are so high ...
> If that is true -- local loop is so hard to build -- why wasn't the
"Everyone Knew" that you couldn't carry even 100 MHz of television
> my local Bell company wanted to sell me long distance, they were
You don't believe, I hope, that they give you "a good deal" out of the
> Who gets to decide what is a "natural monopoly"?
The economy does. I don't have the definition available off the top
> MY phone rates went up to pay for a new telco building to house
What makes you think you didn't benefit from having that choice?
-- Garrett A. Wollman | As the Constitution endures, persons in every email@example.com | generation can invoke its principles in their own Opinions not those | search for greater freedom. of MIT or CSAIL. | - A. Kennedy, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: Steven Lichter: "Re: Is it Sp*m if They Are Offering to Set You Up as a Sp*mmer?"|
|Go to Previous message: firstname.lastname@example.org: "Re: Broadband Competition Must Surely be Working"|
|May be in reply to: email@example.com: "Broadband Competition Must Surely be Working"|
|Next in thread: firstname.lastname@example.org: "Re: Broadband Competition Must Surely be Working"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|