|Re: May 1966 - Customers Angry at Switch to Message Units|
|Sam Spade (Sam@coldmail.com)|
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:46:49 -0700
> May 1966 -- NYT -- Suffolk County Long Island telephone subscribers were
> With "message units", the bill only shows a gross number of units
> Business people said they needed itemization for tax purposes.
> Others complained they had large bills but no way to figure them out.
> The phone company said the switch saved customers 20% in bookkeeping
The same B.S. was given by Pacific Telephone in the Los Angeles Metro
I recall complaining about it, and the rep told me I could have my
Within a year itemization of message units was free (after the
It all reminds me of an Al Capp cartoon of the era. Al Capp was the
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: firstname.lastname@example.org: "Re: NY Times Reporter Seeks Info About History of the SIT Tone"|
|Go to Previous message: danny burstein: "Re: May 1966 - Customers Angry at Switch to Message Units From Toll"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|