TD Extra News
Add this Digest to your personal or
The Telecom Digest for February 05, 2011
Volume 30 : Issue 32 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
For iPhone, Almost Heaven (Monty Solomon) Verizon Beats AT&T in Voice Calls for iPhones (Monty Solomon) Re: Video conferencing phone booth (John Levine) Re: Celcom Axiata & DiGi agreed to share network infrastructure | Malaysian Wireless
(Koos van den Hout) Re: New numbering rules for phones in Australia (Lisa or Jeff)
====== 29 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ====== Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address- included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the email. =========================== Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome. We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. Geoffrey Welsh =========================== See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:26:04 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: For iPhone, Almost Heaven Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> For iPhone, Almost Heaven By DAVID POGUE February 2, 2011 It's here. After almost four years of speculation, the iPhone will finally come to Verizon's network on Feb. 10. And to answer everyone's question, the Verizon iPhone is nearly the same as AT&T's iPhone 4 - but it doesn't drop calls. For several million Americans, that makes it the holy grail. I took the Verizon iPhone to five cities, including the two Bermuda Triangles of AT&T reception: San Francisco and New York. Holding AT&T and Verizon iPhones side by side in the passenger seat of a car, I dialed 777-FILM simultaneously, and then rode around until a call dropped. (Why that number? Because I wanted to call a landline, eliminating the other person's cell reception from the equation. Also, Mr. Moviefone can carry the entire conversation by himself, so I could concentrate on the testing.) In San Francisco, the AT&T phone dropped the call four times in 30 minutes of driving; the Verizon phone never did. The Verizon iPhone also held its line in several Manhattan intersections where the AT&T call died. At a Kennedy airport gate, the AT&T phone couldn't even find a signal; the Verizon dialed with a smug yawn. Most impressively, the Verizon iPhone effortlessly made calls in the Cellphone Signal Torture Chamber of Doom: my house. ... http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/03/technology/personaltech/03pogue.html
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:26:04 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Verizon Beats AT&T in Voice Calls for iPhones Message-ID: <email@example.com> Verizon Beats AT&T in Voice Calls for iPhones February 2, 2011 by Walter S. Mossberg AllThingsD For millions of iPhone owners, or would-be iPhone owners, who dislike AT&T's wireless service or prefer Verizon Wireless service, liberation is at hand. Starting Feb. 10, Apple's iconic smart phone finally will be available in the U.S. on a second carrier, Verizon, instead of just on AT&T, which has been the exclusive iPhone network since the device launched in 2007. Current Verizon customers can pre-order the iPhone Thursday. Complaints about dropped voice calls, or calls that can't be initiated, on AT&T's service, especially on iPhones, have been legion. Meanwhile, Verizon has enjoyed a general reputation for reliable voice service. So, many frustrated AT&T iPhone users and those scared off by reports of dropped calls, or simply loyal to Verizon, have been eagerly anticipating this move. To these people, I'm here to say: Yes, there are some major benefits to having your iPhone on Verizon, but, as with all good things, there are also trade-offs. I've been testing a Verizon iPhone 4 and comparing it to an AT&T iPhone 4, which has been out since last summer. The phones themselves are essentially identical, except for the fact that they have different radios inside to accommodate the two carriers' differing network technologies. They aren't interchangeable. ... http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20110202/verizon-apple-iphone4-review/
Date: 4 Feb 2011 04:36:18 -0000 From: John Levine <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Video conferencing phone booth Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> > I just want to sit down and begin seeing and talking to some people >on the opposite coast, for about an hour, right now, without having >to fly there, and without having to install and learn still another >Mac app (especially when networking is involved). I'd suggest finding a high school kid and pay him or her $20 to set up Skype on your laptop. Really. Having done the video studio thing, I can tell you there is no video phone booth business because Skype et all have killed it. Unless you lived next door to the studio, you'd probably spend more time driving there than it'd take to download and set up Skype, particularly on a Macbook which has the audio and video hardware already installed and configured. R's, John
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 19:14:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Koos van den Hout <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Celcom Axiata & DiGi agreed to share network infrastructure | Malaysian Wireless Message-ID: <email@example.com> John Mayson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in <AANLkTikVphc21yQ44ftSzeRQXzzmR2d_sDw+EZEqntNW@mail.gmail.com>: > DiGi & Celcom Axiata have agreed to share an initial of 218 sites or > base stations from each provider to save about 2.2 billion ringgit > ($719 million) over 10 years. > How much sharing goes on in other countries? Lots (at least here in the Netherlands) because guidelines in cities on allowing new constructions for cellular base antennas state that new constructions should be avoided when site-sharing is available or when existing constructions can be used. Site-sharing for commercial reasons started a bit a few years ago but zoning regulations have taken over now ;) Koos van den Hout -- Koos van den Hout, PGP keyid DSS/1024 0xF0D7C263 via keyservers email@example.com Visit the site about books with reviews http://idefix.net/ http://www.virtualbookcase.com/
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:23:24 -0800 (PST) From: Lisa or Jeff <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: New numbering rules for phones in Australia Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> On Feb 3, 2:57 am, David Clayton <dcs...@myrealbox.com> wrote: > As part of the rollout of the NBN (fibre to the premises) the incumbent > telco is going to gradually decommission all the "copper". > They continually complain about the upkeep costs of such old plant anyway, > so it will save people money as the fibre infrastructure maintenance > should be a lot less over its intended life. Obviously fibre has advantages in capacity over copper, but does that mean existing copper plant should be abandoned? Why is fibre cable cheaper to maintain than existing copper cable? I would guess that the big maintenance expense of outdoor physical plant would physical protection against weather and injury and access for maintenance. Wouldn't physical protection costs, such as durable outer shells, be the same for copper as fibre? If say a car knocks down a pole carrying lines, isn't the biggest cost labor of the crew to replace the pole and remount the lines?
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne. Contact information: Bill Horne Telecom Digest 43 Deerfield Road Sharon MA 02067-2301 781-784-7287 bill at horne dot net Subscribe: email@example.com?body=subscribe telecom Unsubscribe: firstname.lastname@example.org?body=unsubscribe telecom This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2009 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.
End of The Telecom Digest (5 messages)