29 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for May 15, 2011
====== 29 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 07:20:01 -0500 From: email@example.com (Robert Bonomi) To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: History Early Data transmission technical considerations Message-ID: <0PednWQbcvFsvFDQnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@posted.nuvoxcommunications> In article <4DCC8263.email@example.com>, Jim Bennett <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >On 2011-05-12 00:27, Reed wrote: >> On 5/11/11 4:51 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: >>> In article<E_ydndNE-PZOd1TQnZ2dnUVZ_oGdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, >>> Reed<email@example.com> wrote: >>>> The term "bit" still describes the speed of the raw "data transmission >>>> over private lines". >>> >>> Sometimes "yes", sometimes "no". >>> >>> Consider analog line signalling where one 'symbol' represents multiple >>> 'bits' in the original data stream. >>> >>> Thus the 'classical' distinction between 'bits' and 'baud' in more >>> commplex >>> analog data links. >>> >>> For an extreme case, consider the Telebit Corp "PEP" protocol, used in >>> their 'trailblazer' (and compatible) modems. >>> >> >> Well, yes, various methods have been used to increase the usable bit >> rate of an otherwise band-limited channel. QAM, Trellis coding, etc. >> However I think the the usable "speed" of the channel would still be >> expressed in bits per second. >> >> Also I took "L or J's" comment as aimed at bytes, etc. Perhaps they >> meant baud, since that always has been a common point of >> mis-understanding when speaking of modem speeds. >> >> Thanks for the reminder, Reed >> >> > >Actually, I believe that Lisa and/or Jeff were pointing out that 1957 >was a very early use of the term "bit." I suppose so, IF you forget about Nyquist in the 1920s, Shannon in the 1940s, and everybody else in between.
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:41:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Lisa or Jeff <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Battery technology Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> A while back there was a discussion on this newsgroup about storage battery characteristics. The Sept 1970 issue of BSTJ has several detailed technical articles on new lead-acid battery technology developments the Bell System undertook to improve performance and economy. That might answer some of the questions posed here. http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bstj/vol49-1970/bstj-vol49-issue07.html For radio buffs, this issue includes an article about rain interference: "Some Calculations on Coupling Between Satellite Communications and Terrestrial Radio-Relay Systems Due to Scattering by Rain".
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 10:54:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Lisa or Jeff <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: BSTJ Telstar Message-ID: <email@example.com> On May 12, 12:39 pm, Lisa or Jeff <lisa_or_j...@invalid.telecom- digest.org> wrote: > Knowing of your interest in radio, you might find the following > interesting. It's amazing the basic issues that we take for granted > today all had to be carefully worked out. Going back earlier, two articles on overseas shortwave radio: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bstj/vol09-1930/articles/bstj9-2-258.pdf http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bstj/vol09-1930/articles/bstj9-2-270.pdf Ship to shore radiotelephone: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bstj/vol09-1930/articles/bstj9-3-407.pdf
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
|Contact information:||Bill Horne|
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2009 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.