29 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for May 30, 2011
====== 29 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: 28 May 2011 22:31:53 -0000 From: "John Levine" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Pre-paid SIM cards in the US Message-ID: <email@example.com> >> ... SIMs aren't tied to phone numbers. That relationship is made at the >> switch. >Interesting ... in Poland, at least with GSM provider Orange (aka Centertel), >each starter-SIM you buy comes with phone number already assigned to it and >printed right on its blisterpack and on its credit-card-sized card-holder >(right alongside that SIM's PUK number, for that matter :-) ). That's pretty common in Europe, but it's a marketing thing, not a technical one. You will almost certainly find that if you have an existing mobile phone number you want to port to your new phone, they can arrange it without changing the SIM. R's, John
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 22:27:45 -0400 From: T <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Need a large PBX. Message-ID: <MPG.firstname.lastname@example.org> In article <MPG.email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org says... > > In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org > says... > > > > >Call your Nortel rep. They will actually talk to you. > > > > Nortel? They're in the process of being dismantled. Who bought > > their PBX business? > > > > R's, > > John > > Didn't Google buy a bunch of Nortel's patents? > > And here's my take on VoIP systems, particularly Cisco. Not bad at all. > And they don't need any special networking anymore. > > In fact my Cisco phone at work has my Ubuntu box hanging off it. Oh but I should add something I just ran into. I don't like the fact that the Cisco phones package up voicemails as a wav file and then email it to you. So if I come into the office and see the message waiting LED's lit, I'll get the voicemail fromt the phone. If you do that it never forwards the voicemail to email. Well this past Friday I listened to my message, deleted the message and the LED's never extinguished. It was that way up until I left for the day so I filed a help desk ticket. We'll see what happens when I go in on Tuesday.
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 22:32:15 -0400 From: T <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Busy trunks--subscriber behavior Message-ID: <MPG.email@example.com> In article <LfudnW3r6shd_VzQnZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@giganews.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org says... > If a lot of subscribers remained off-hook, no harm, no foul, unlike a No > 5 XBAR, which could crash given sufficient permanent off-hooks. > > That's because the 5 XBAR used the markers for everything and being that markers were nothing but logical arragangements of relays, and limited depending on the office design, it was a fairly simple matter to overwhelm them. But those markers were the second or third brush at common control. The hybrid then digital systems that replaced them benefited from lessons learned.
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 22:33:36 -0400 From: T <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Busy trunks--subscriber behavior Message-ID: <MPG.email@example.com> In article <5e292$4dc31908$4038ffec$28817@PRIMUS.CA>, firstname.lastname@example.org says... > > Stephen wrote: > > > and modems can be even worse..... > > On a slightly different but somewhat related topic: > > I seem to recall ILECs complaining that long modem connections were > playing havoc with their provisioning plans... despite the growth of > the overall market, the fate of companies like AOL suggests that the > number of dialup users has shrunk. I wonder how much the factors used > in provisioning planning changed as broadband replaced dialup as the > most common connection type? Perhaps the high availability of trunk > capacity mentioned in this thread is - at least in part - the result > of capacity added during the dialup heyday and underutilized since? > Or have technology upgrades over the past decade or two simply > provided so much capacity that voice traffic can't normally put a dent > in it? Well, a lot of the ILEC traffic is moving off the traditional switched network into VoIP services. Sure, it ultimately hits a switch somewhere in the chain but it's a purely digital signal so easy to mix into a time or frequency domain.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
|Contact information:||Bill Horne|
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2009 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.