29 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for June 12, 2011
====== 29 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:11:56 -0500 From: John Mayson <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Unsecured Call Warnings In iOS 5 Message-ID: <BANLkTimwf+YvDFfMv7ZTXs72mS_2ipeoMg@mail.gmail.com> "If you're on a call on a GSM iPhone (AT&T, not Verizon) and there's a risk of someone tapping your call, you'll see the "Unsecured Call" message pictured at right." http://www.businessinsider.com/ios-5-unsecured-call-notification-2011-6 How much of a problem is this? And are CDMA phone immune?
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 01:59:20 -0700 From: Sam Spade <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Cable rates are rising, but don't blame your provider - entirely Message-ID: <Z7idnUf_cND1s27QnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@giganews.com> Telecom Digest Moderator wrote: .. > > Just tell Mayor Menino that he's a pretentious blow-hard, and organize a > boycott of Comcast: they'll get the message. Better yet, turn it off, > get a library card, and read a book. That isn't going to happen. Perhaps going to Dish or Direct is the answer. ***** Moderator's Note ***** If it doesn't happen for others, they get to bear the consequences. You have your own choice. Bill Horne Moderator
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 04:28:53 -0500 From: Neal McLain <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Cable rates are rising, but don't blame your provider - entirely. Message-ID: <4DF33555.firstname.lastname@example.org> In Message-ID: <email@example.com Monty Solomon <firstname.lastname@example.org quoted Boston.com: > Cable rates are rising, but don't blame your provider - > entirely > By Johnny Diaz > Globe Staff / June 5, 2011 > > Cable subscribers in Boston are fuming about rising > bills, and many blame what they see as Comcast Corp.'s > virtual monopoly in the city.... > > For most subscribers, the biggest driver of these rising > cable bills is the increased cost of programming - the > result, ironically, of competition with satellite > companies, Internet TV, movie rental providers, and > Verizon Corp.'s FiOS network, analysts said. As these > services bid for programming, sports, entertainment, and > local channels demand - and receive - higher fees from > cable companies, which ultimately get passed on to > consumers. Surprise! Same point I've been trying to make for years: - At the retail level, competition acts to lower prices because the customer -- the subscriber -- only needs one supplier. - At the wholesale level, competition acts to increase prices because all retailers have to buy the same products from the same monopoly suppliers. And a monopoly it is, created and protected by the federal government. As I noted in thread "Kerry outlines bill to resolve TV disputes [telecom]" (Oct 26 2010, 12:00 am) http://tinyurl.com/3y4xyfl: > - A broadcast licensee can elect must-carry or > retransmission-consent with respect to any MVPD that > distributes its signal within its home DMA. > > - A broadcast licensee has exclusive market protection > within its DMA. > > - A broadcast licensee (or its parent company) is > permitted to bundle broadcast programming with non- > broadcast programming. > > - Every MVPD must deal with the licensee serving the DMA > in which said MVPD distributes the licensee's signal. > > - If a MVPD cannot reach a retransmission-consent > agreement with a given licensee, it is prohibited from > carrying same-network programming from any other > broadcast station. In any other business, an arrangement like this would be called a monopoly. But in the upside-down world of broadcast television, it's called "consumer protection." If Senator Kerry really wants to do something about cable prices, he should introduce a bill to repeal the grotesquely-misnamed "Cable Television Protection and Competition Act of 1992." Our moderator commented: > Comcrap is the most arrogant, intractable, intransigent, > and incompetent telephone service provider in the world: > I know, because I had the misfortune of paying them for > telephone service years ago. > > Having said that, I'll also say that cable TV viewers who > don't cancel overpriced or substandard television > offerings get little sympathy from me: it's an > entertainment service, not a food or fuel monopoly, so > nobody is forced to put up with prices they find > inconvenient. If cable TV offerings are "substandard," what do you define as "standard"? > Just tell Mayor Menino that he's a pretentious blow-hard, > and organize a boycott of Comcast: they'll get the > message. Better yet, turn it off, get a library card, and > read a book. If Menino wants to accomplish something, instead of blaming Comcast for ever-rising prices, he should join Comcast in its retransmission-consent battles with programmers. And he should certainly join the efforts of the senior senator from his state to address the issue. Neal McLain
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
|Contact information:||Bill Horne|
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2009 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.