29 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for June 14, 2011
====== 29 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 19:10:40 -0700 From: John David Galt <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: New telephone area-code 431 in Winnipeg area? Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Some Guy wrote: > The caller ID info is injected during the space between the first and > second rings - right? Do telco's allow customers to inject their own > info somehow to over-ride the real data? Any business that operates its own PBX is allowed to generate its own Caller ID strings. I don't know of any telco that vets them. Technically, this isn't that different from the way some people used to commit DDOS attacks against large parts of the Internet - simply by sending lots of network packets with random numbers where the From: IP address is supposed to go. Today this technique no longer works in most of the world, because your Internet provider checks that the packets your computer sends to it are "from" IP numbers registered as belonging to you or to itself. If too many aren't, the provider disables your account and tells you why. All telcos technically can, and ought to, similarly vet the numbers in Caller ID strings their PBX-owning subscribers send. But as long as the only effect of junk calls on telcos' bottom line is as paying traffic, the telcos will continue enabling the spammers and frustrating any tech that would help you block their calls. All this would be grounds for a well-deserved class action lawsuit, but apparently AT&T now has an unbreakable defense against those, too. Darn!
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 00:38:41 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: I.M.F. Reports Cyberattack Led to 'Very Major Breach' Message-ID: <email@example.com> I.M.F. Reports Cyberattack Led to 'Very Major Breach' By DAVID E. SANGER and JOHN MARKOFF June 11, 2011 WASHINGTON - The International Monetary Fund, still struggling to find a new leader after the arrest of its managing director last month in New York, was hit recently by what computer experts describe as a large and sophisticated cyberattack whose dimensions are still unknown. The fund, which manages financial crises around the world and is the repository of highly confidential information about the fiscal condition of many nations, told its staff and its board of directors about the attack on Wednesday. But it did not make a public announcement. Several senior officials with knowledge of the attack said it was both sophisticated and serious. "This was a very major breach," said one official, who said that it had occurred over the last several months, even before Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the French politician who ran the fund, was arrested on charges of sexually assaulting a chamber maid in a New York hotel. ... http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/world/12imf.html
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:51:12 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Hackers and thieves a growing Web menace / Technology lag leaves systems vulnerable Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Hackers and thieves a growing Web menace Technology lag leaves systems vulnerable By Hiawatha Bray Globe Staff / June 11, 2011 On the Internet, there's nowhere left to hide. Around the world, computer networks are getting more vulnerable even as they grow more sophisticated. They are being penetrated and looted by digital intruders. The personal records of 100 million people were stolen in an attack on Sony Corp.'s video game networks. Up to 210,000 unemployed Massachusetts residents were put at risk by data theft software that infected computers at the state's Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development. And in March, criminals stole vital information from Bedford data protection company RSA Security, a division of Hopkinton storage giant EMC Corp. The stolen RSA data was later used in a hacker raid on defense contractor Lock heed Martin Corp., an RSA client. The list of data breaches grows almost daily, and while consumers and businesses can take steps to reduce the risk of losing sensitive information, security analysts say that making our computer networks truly secure is virtually impossible. ... http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/articles/2011/06/11/hackers_thieves_run_wild_on_internet/
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 04:40:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Neal McLain <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Cable rates are rising, but don't blame your provider - entirely Message-ID: <email@example.com> Sam Spade <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > To: email@example.com > > Telecom Digest Moderator wrote: > .. >> Just tell Mayor Menino that he's a pretentious blow-hard, and organize a >> boycott of Comcast: they'll get the message. Better yet, turn it off, >> get a library card, and read a book. > That isn't going to happen. > Perhaps going to Dish or Direct is the answer. You missed the whole point of the original Boston.com article. Going to Dish or DirecTV is simply a switch from one retailer to another. The point of the article (and my post a few hours after yours) is to point out the effect of monopoly situation at the WHOLESALE level. If Walmart wants to sell TV sets or cabbages or shoes at retail, it can choose among wholesalers, and negotiate prices based on its market power in the retail marketplace. It can use its market power to force wholesalers to compete for its business. Furthermore, it can choose to purchase, or not purchase, other products from the same wholesalers. Walmart's competitors are free to make the same choices. But if Comcast wants to sell (carry) the signal of WFXT (the Fox affiliate in the Boston DMA), at retail, it has one choice: News Corporation. News Corp has the market power to demand whatever it wishes. It has the power to force Comcast to carry, and pay for, other News Corp products such as FX, Fox News, Fox Sports, and WZMY-TV (the MyNetworkTV affiliate in the Boston DMA) as part of the deal. The fact that Comcast has competitors (Dish and DirecTV) increases News Corp's market power. And, of course, Dish and DirecTV face the same situation in their negotiations with News Corp. >***** Moderator's Note ***** > > If it doesn't happen for others, they get to bear the consequences. You have > your own choice. What choice? WFXT from Comcast, WFXT from Dish, or WFXT from DirecTV? No matter which you choose, News Corp still gets its pound of flesh. Now I realize, of course, that you could receive WFXT off the air for free and without being forced to pay for Fox News, Fox Sports, Fox Whatever. Good for you! But be sure to thank all those Comcast, Dish, and DirecTV subscribers that are subsidizing you. That's why it's called "consumer protection"! Neal McLain ***** Moderator's Note ***** "What choice?"? The choice to not watch it, of course. I've written about the evils of television in this and other forums, and my views haven't changed. If you want to believe that the Tall White Guy should make all the decisions, that's your choice. I don't care what WFXT-TV broadcasts, or what Comcrap pays to relay the ooze from one screen to another, because I don't watch it. Bill Horne Moderator
Date: 12 Jun 2011 16:56:39 -0400 From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Scott Dorsey) To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: New telephone area-code 431 in Winnipeg area? Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> In article <4DF2579D.E927FA74@Guy.com>, Some Guy <Some@Guy.com> wrote: >How exactly can someone inject their own caller-ID information into the >phone system? Order a T-1 from the telco. You send the telco the audio and the signalling information in digital format. That includes the CID. The ANI is determined by the telco itself; they don't want anyone spoofing that and not getting billed properly. But the CID is determined by the originator. >The caller ID info is injected during the space between the first and >second rings - right? Do telco's allow customers to inject their own >info somehow to over-ride the real data? No. But if you're originating the call from a PBX or from a VoIP gateway, you can tell the exchange what the data are. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
|Contact information:||Bill Horne|
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2009 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.