30 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for December 12, 2011
Volume 30 : Issue 316 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Re: OSHA: Two Federal DOT Agencies Ban Hand-Held Phone (Pete Cresswell)
Re: OSHA: Two Federal DOT Agencies Ban Hand-Held Phone Use (John Stahl)
The ghost of Nortel continues to haunt Canada's tech sector (Bill Horne)
More bad news for LightSquared (Bill Horne)

====== 30 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.

Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:51:26 -0500 From: Pete Cresswell <withheld@invalid.telecom-digest.org> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: OSHA: Two Federal DOT Agencies Ban Hand-Held Phone Message-ID: <kak9e79hgtfqok0k8tmsc6d30nsnqs6fgr@4ax.com> Per David Clayton: >The solution is blindingly simple - just make those who are need/want to >use communications devices while driving pass a special skills test to >ensure that they are capable of doing so. > >One can easily imagine that achieving such a thing will be trivial for >most of those professionals mentioned, but would be a challenge for the >vast majority of drivers on the roads who are clueless as to how poor >their overall skills actually are. Sounds ok reading the words, but I would observe that here in Southeastern Pennsylvania (USA), they can't even get people to use their turn signals - cops included. -- PeteCresswell ***** Moderator's Note ***** Pete, please contact me offline. Bill Horne Moderator
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:22:44 -0500 From: John Stahl <aljon@stny.rr.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: OSHA: Two Federal DOT Agencies Ban Hand-Held Phone Use Message-ID: <86.74.00585.ACAC4EE4@cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com> >--- On Mon, 12/5/11, John Stahl <aljon@stny.rr.com> wrote: > >> US Occupational Health & Safety has reported on their web site ...snip... >> require their drivers to comply." These new rules take effect >> January 3, 2012. Not to beat this subject to death, but there seems to be conflicting stories and accident statistics regarding the distraction caused by texting/talking while driving. In a recent article in the Chicago Sun-Times publication, Post-Tribune (on-line), titled " Study shows increase in drivers texting behind the wheel", By JOAN LOWY, dated Dec. 8, 2011, the Ms. Lowy opens with " Texting while driving increased 50 percent last year despite a rush by states to ban the practice, federal safety officials said Thursday...." Further along in the article, she supports the article title with, "There were an estimated 3,092 deaths in crashes affected by distractions in 2010, the safety administration said...." Then in another interesting statistic she indicates in an apparent opposition to the deaths related to driving while distracted, that over all deaths in traffic accidents are down: "Overall, 32,885 people died in traffic crashes in the United States in 2010, a nearly 3 percent drop and the lowest number of fatalities since 1949...." Now in relation to the last sentence, the article indicates the decrease in traffic deaths with," Safety researchers generally attribute the lower deaths to a decline in driving because of the poor economy combined with better designed and equipped cars and stronger safety laws." But since the comparison statistics go back to 1949 where there were a lot less drivers than today and automobiles were built like (as I recall) "tanks" - cars of those days were made out of steel not plastics and aluminum - it doesn't seem that anywhere are these "researchers" relating "apples to apples"! Article located at: http://posttrib.suntimes.com/news/9328300-418/study-shows-increase-in-drivers-texting-behind-the-wheel.html A person might wonder why all the push against texting/talking while driving because another article on SmartMotorist.com indicates that, "Cell phones have gotten a lot of negative media attention recently -- but other more low-tech distractions cause most traffic accidents. Have you ever spilled hot coffee on yourself? Dropped something on the floor while driving?...." Notice the article indicates that "most" traffic accidents are not caused by cell phone usage. So what's the big push to stop mobile communication? Article located at: http://www.smartmotorist.com/traffic-and-safety-guideline/distracted-drivers-cause-motor-vehicle-accidents.html Who knows, perhaps (tongue-in-cheek) some "anti-mobile communication" group who is against any form of wireless communication or maybe yet, the telephone land-line companies are at the source of all this negativism!!!! John Stahl
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:10:33 -0500 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: The ghost of Nortel continues to haunt Canada's tech sector Message-ID: <4EE5A8E9.5020000@horne.net> By BARRIE McKENNA </authors/barrie-mckenna/>December 04, 2011 Next month marks a grim anniversary in the annals of Canadian business. Nortel Networks, the former flagship of the country's high-tech industry, filed for bankruptcy protection on Jan. 14, 2009. Three years on, the company's spectacular flameout remains a potent symbol of the country's failed innovation potential. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/commentary/barrie-mckenna/the-ghost-of-nortel-still-haunts-us/article2259637/?utm_medium=Feeds%3A%20RSS%2FAtom&utm_source=Home&utm_content=2259637 -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:03:08 -0500 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: More bad news for LightSquared Message-ID: <4EE5A72C.2040904@horne.net> According to a story by David Murphy in PC Magazine: When it rains for LightSquared, it pours for LightSquared. The ambitious, proposed wholesaler of LTE service -- designed to ultimately give consumers additional options for tapping into high-speed mobile Internet -- has come under a great deal of fire for the alleged interference that its network creates for common GPS devices. And the results of a new government test certainly don't help LightSquared make its case. According to the news service Bloomberg, leaked draft results of government tests indicate that the base stations for LightSquared's proposed 4G LTE network created "harmful interference" for 75 percent of the 92 GPS devices used within the test -- up to 109 yards away from the base station, we note. And the overall conclusion? The analysis reports that that "millions of GPS units are not compatible" Full story is at http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2397491,00.asp . Bill -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly)
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org

Copyright (C) 2011 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (4 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues